Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 737-764 , October 2008

Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art

  • Harry K. Genant, MD, FACR, FRCR (honorary) (Professor Emeritus)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Tel.: +1 415 823 5758.

References 

  1. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM. Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA: The journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288(15):1889–1897
  2. Overgaard K, Hansen M, Dirksen K, et al. Rectal salmon calcitonin for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcified Tissue International. 1992;51(3):184–188
  3. Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, et al. Rate of forearm bone loss is associated with an increased risk of fracture independently of bone mass in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20(11):1929–1935
  4. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone. 2004;34(1):195–202
  5. Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, et al. Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. The American Journal of Medicine. 2002;112(4):281–289
  6. Delmas PD, Li Z, Cooper C. Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and fracture risk reduction with antiresorptive drugs: some issues with meta-analyses. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(2):330–337
  7. Seeman E. Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2008;26(1):1–8
  8. van der Meulen M, Jepsen K, Mikic B. Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. Bone. 2001;29(2):101–104
  9. Hernandez CJ, Keaveny TM. A biomechanical perspective on bone quality. Bone. 2006;39(6):1173–1181
  10. Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporosis International. 2001;12(12):989–995
  11. Faulkner K. The tale of the T-score: review and perspective. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(4):347–352
  12. Gnudi S, Malavolta N, Testi D, et al. Differences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women. The British Journal of Radiology. 2004;77(915):219–223
  13. Alonso G, Curiel M, Carranza F, et al. Multicentral project for research in osteoporosis, femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporosis International. 2000;11:714–720
  14. Beck T, Ruff C, Warden K, et al. Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Investigative Radiology. 1990;25(1):6–18
  15. Majumdar S. Magnetic resonance imaging for osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiology. 2008;37(2):95–97
  16. Bousson V, Peyrin F, Bergot C, et al. Cortical bone in the human femoral neck: three-dimensional appearance and porosity using synchrotron radiation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(5):794–801
  17. Aaron J, Makins N, Sagreiya K. The microanatomy of trabecular bone loss in normal aging men and women. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1987;215:260–271
  18. Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, et al. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1999;14(7):1167–1174
  19. Crabtree N, Loveridge N, Parker M, et al. Intracapsular hip fracture and the region-specific loss of cortical bone: analysis by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2001;16(7):1318–1328
  20. Wehrli F, Leonard M, Saha P, et al. Quantitative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals structural implications of renal osteodystrophy on trabecular and cortical bone. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2004;20(1):83–89
  21. Wehrli F. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2007;25(2):390–409
  22. Mosekilde L. Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures). Bone and Mineral. 1990;10(1):13–35
  23. Hwang S, Wehrli F, Williams J. Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength. Medical Physics. 1997;24(8):1255–1261
  24. Beuf O, Newitt D, Mosekilde L, et al. Trabecular structure assessment in lumbar vertebrae specimens using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and relationship with mechanical competence. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2001;16(8):1511–1519
  25. Sell C, Masi J, Burghardt A, et al. Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla – calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference. Calcified Tissue International. 2005;76(5):355–364
  26. Damilakis J, Maris TG, Karantanas AH. An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques. European Radiology. 2007;17(6):1591–1602
  27. Sahota O, Pearson D, Cawte SW, et al. Site-specific variation in the classification of osteoporosis, and the diagnostic reclassification using the lowest individual lumbar vertebra T-score compared with the L1-L4 mean, in early postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis International. 2000;11(10):852–857
  28. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 1996;312(7041):1254–1259
  29. Jones G, White C, Nguyen T, et al. Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporosis International. 1996;6(3):233–239
  30. Kiebzak GM, Binkley N, Lewiecki EM, et al. Diagnostic agreement at the total hip using different DXA systems and the NHANES III database. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2007;10(2):132–137
  31. Bolotin HH. DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling. Bone. 2007;41(1):138–154
  32. Blake GM, Fogelman I. How important are BMD accuracy errors for the clinical interpretation of DXA Scans?. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2008;23(4):457–462
  33. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporosis International. 1995;5(4):262–270
  34. Fogelman I, Blake G. Bone densitometry: an update. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2068–2070
  35. Frost S, Nguyen N, Center J, et al. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers. Bone. 2007;41(4):690–697
  36. Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, et al. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?. Osteoporosis International. 2003;14(8):688–693
  37. Maas M, Hangartner T, Mariani G, et al. Recommendations for the assessment and monitoring of skeletal manifestations in children with Gaucher disease. Skeletal Radiology. 2008;37(3):185–188
  38. Johnell O, Kanis J, Oden A, et al. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20(7):1185–1194
  39. Nguyen N, Pongchaiyakul C, Center J, et al. Identification of high-risk individuals for hip fracture: a 14-year prospective study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20(11):1921–1928
  40. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, et al. Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporosis International. 2007;18(8):1109–1117
  41. Engelke K, Gluer C. Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry: part 1: errors and diagnosis. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17(9):1283–1292
  42. Faulkner K, Pocock N. Future methods in the assessment of bone mass and structure. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology. 2001;15(2):359–383
  43. Prevrhal S, Shepherd J, Faulkner K, et al. Comparison of DXA Hip Structural Analysis with Volumetric QCT. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2008;11(2):232–236
  44. Faulkner K, Wacker W, Barden H, et al. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17(4):593–599
  45. Genant H, Cann C, Ettinger B, et al. Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1982;97:699–705
  46. Genant H, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1996;11(6):707–730
  47. Rehman Q, Lang T, Modin G, et al. Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2002;46(5):1292–1297
  48. Riggs B, Melton Iii LJ, Robb R, et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(12):1945–1954
  49. Lang T, Keyak J, Heitz M, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone. 1997;21(1):101–108
  50. Marshall L, Lang T, Lambert L, et al. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group Dimensions and volumetric BMD of the proximal femur and their relation to age among older U.S. men. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(8):1197–1206
  51. Riggs B, Melton L, Robb R, et al. Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(2):315–323
  52. Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, et al. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(6):1006–1012
  53. Cheng X, Li J, Lu Y, et al. Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with hip fracture. Bone. 2007;40(1):169–174
  54. Bousson V, Le Bras A, Roqueplan F, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17(6):855–864
  55. Huiskes R. If bone is the answer, then what is the question?. Journal of Anatomy. 2000;197(Pt 2):145–156
  56. Banse X, Devogelaer J, Grynpas M. Patient-specific microarchitecture of vertebral cancellous bone: a peripheral quantitative computed tomographic and histological study. Bone. 2002;30(6):829–835
  57. Kim D, Hunt C, Zauel R, et al. The effect of regional variations of the trabecular bone properties on the compressive strength of human vertebral bodies. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2007;35(11):1907–1913
  58. Ito M, Ikeda K, Nishiguchi M, et al. Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20(10):1828–1836
  59. Bauer J, Kohlmann S, Eckstein F, et al. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro. Calcified Tissue International. 2006;78(2):78–89
  60. Keyak J, Rossi S, Jones K, et al. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998;31(2):125–133
  61. Keaveny T, Donley D, Hoffmann P, et al. Effects of teriparatide and alendronate on vertebral strength as assessed by finite element modeling of QCT scans in women with osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22(1):149–157
  62. Crawford R, Cann C, Keaveny T. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2003;33(4):744–750
  63. Grampp S, Jergas M, Lang P, et al. Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996;167(1):133–140
  64. Grampp S, Lang P, Jergas M, et al. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1995;10(10):1566–1576
  65. Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Lochmuller E, et al. Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images. 2002;30(6):842–848
  66. Khosla S, Riggs B, Atkinson E, et al. Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(1):124–131
  67. Boutroy S, Bouxsein M, Munoz F, et al. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005;90(12):6508–6515
  68. Parfitt A, Mathews C, Villanueva A, et al. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1983;72(4):1396–1409
  69. Phan C, Matsuura M, Bauer J, et al. Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference. Radiology. 2006;239(2):488–496
  70. Jiang Y, Zhao J, Liao E, et al. Application of micro-CT assessment of 3-D bone microstructure in preclinical and clinical studies. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2005;23(Suppl):122–131
  71. Jiang Y, Zhao J, Mitlak B, et al. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) [teriparatide] improves both cortical and cancellous bone structure. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2003;18(11):1932–1941
  72. Bonse U, Busch F, Gunnewig O, et al. 3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and 10(-4) energy resolution. Bone and Mineral. 1994;25(1):25–38
  73. Engelke K, Graeff W, Meiss L, et al. High spatial resolution imaging of bone mineral using computed microtomography. Comparison with microradiography and undecalcified histologic sections. Investigative Radiology. 1993;28(4):341–349
  74. Larrue A, Rattner A, Laroche N, et al Feasibility of micro-crack detection in human trabecular bone images from 3D synchrotron microtomography. Paper presented at IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2007.
  75. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al. A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2000;3(1):1–7
  76. Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Vrahoriti H, et al. Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device. Investigative Radiology. 2003;38(4):207–211
  77. Guglielmi G, Njeh C, de Terlizzi F, et al. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound, phalangeal morphometric variables, and vertebral fracture discrimination. Calcified Tissue International. 2003;72(4):469–477
  78. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, et al. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(8):963–968
  79. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Vagios E, et al. Effect of region of interest location on ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus. Calcified Tissue International. 1998;63(4):300–305
  80. Frost M, Blake G, Fogelman I. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Osteoporosis International. 1999;10(6):441–449
  81. Frost M, Blake G, Fogelman I. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?. Osteoporosis International. 2000;11(5):425–433
  82. Frost M, Blake G, Fogelman I. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2001;16(2):406–416
  83. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C. The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2002;25(4):389–397
  84. Stewart A, Felsenberg D, Eastell R, et al. Relationship between risk factors and QUS in a European population: the OPUS study. Bone. 2006;39(3):609–615
  85. Pongchaiyakul C, Panichkul S, Songpatanasilp T, et al. A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement. Osteoporosis International. 2007;18(4):525–531
  86. Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt A, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo. Osteoporosis International. 2008;19:653–661
  87. Krug R, Han E, Banerjee S, et al. Fully balanced steady-state 3D-spin-echo (bSSSE) imaging at 3 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2006;56(5):1033–1040
  88. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. European Radiology. 2003;13(11):2409–2418
  89. Laib A, Newitt D, Lu Y, et al. New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high-resolution MR images. Osteoporosis International. 2002;13(2):130–136
  90. Wehrli F, Hwang S, Ma J, et al. Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology. 1998;206(2):347–357
  91. Chesnut CH, Majumdar S, Newitt D, et al. Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20(9):1548–1561
  92. Chesnut CH, Silverman S, Andriano K, et al. A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. The American Journal of Medicine. 2000;109(4):267–276
  93. Krug R, Banerjee S, Han E, et al. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(11):1307–1314
  94. Hipp J, Jansujwicz A, Simmons C, et al. Trabecular bone morphology from micro-magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1996;11(2):286–297
  95. Wehrli F, Gomberg B, Saha P, et al. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2001;16(8):1520–1531
  96. Davis C, Genant H, Dunham J. The effects of bone on proton NMR relaxation times of surrounding liquids. Investigative Radiology. 1986 Jun;21(6):472–477
  97. Damilakis J, Maris T, Papadokostakis G, et al. Discriminatory ability of magnetic resonance T2* measurements in a sample of postmenopausal women with low-energy fractures: a comparison with phalangeal speed of sound and dual x-ray absorptiometry. Investigative Radiology. 2004;39(11):706–712
  98. Link T, Majumdar S, Augat P, et al. Proximal femur: assessment for osteoporosis with T2* decay characteristics at MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;209(2):531–536
  99. Bernard C, Liney G, Manton D, et al. Comparison of fat quantification methods: a phantom study at 3.0T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2008;27(1):192–197
  100. Yeung D, Griffith J, Antonio G, et al. Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2005;22(2):279–285
  101. Kugel H, Jung C, Schulte O, et al. Age- and sex-specific differences in the 1H-spectrum of vertebral bone marrow. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2001;13(2):263–268
  102. Griffith J, Yeung D, Antonio G, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;236(3):945–951
  103. Griffith J, Yeung D, Antonio G, et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology. 2006;241(3):831–838
  104. Schellinger D, Lin C, Hatipoglu H, et al. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2001;22(8):1620–1627
  105. Bolotin H, Sievanen H, Grashuis J. Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2003;18(6):1020–1027
  106. Griffith J, Yeung D, Tsang P, et al. Compromised bone marrow perfusion in osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2008;23(7):1068–1075
  107. Yeh O, Keaveny T. Relative roles of microdamage and microfracture in the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2001;19(6):1001–1007
  108. Njeh C, Fuerst T, Hans D, et al. Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1999;50(1):215–236
  109. Kalender W. Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Osteoporosis International. 1992;2(2):82–87
  110. Huda W, Morin R. Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry. The British Journal of Radiology. 1996;69(821):422–425

PII: S1521-690X(08)00081-X

doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.07.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 737-764 , October 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution