Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 737-764, October 2008

Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art

  • Harry K. Genant, MD, FACR, FRCR (honorary) (Professor Emeritus)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Tel.: +1 415 823 5758.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

Bone fracture occurs when the bone strength (i.e. the ability of the bone to resist a force) is less than the force applied to the bone. In the elderly, falls represent the more severe forces applied to bone. Bone density is a good marker of bone strength, and has been used widely in this respect. Nevertheless, many aspects of bone strength cannot be explained by bone density alone. For this reason there has been increasing interest in studying architectural parameters of bone, beyond bone density, which may affect bone strength. Macro-architectural parameters include e.g. bone size and geometry assessed with techniques such as radiography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (QCT), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Micro-architectural parameters include fine cortical and trabecular structural detail which can be evaluated using high-resolution imaging techniques such as multidetector CT, MRI, and high-resolution peripheral QCT. These techniques are providing a great deal of new information on the physiological architectural responses of bone to aging, weightlessness, and treatment. This will ultimately lead to the prediction of fracture risk being improved through a combined assessment of bone density and architectural parameters.

Key words: osteoporosis, radiography, DXA, quantitative ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-690X(08)00081-X

doi:10.1016/j.beem.2008.07.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 737-764, October 2008