Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 480-495, September 2007

Tumor risk in disorders of sex development (DSD)

  • Leendert H.J. Looijenga (Professor, Biologist, Head Research)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./Fax: +31 10 4088329/65.

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Building Be, Room 430b, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Urology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Department of Pediatric Endocrinology Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Building Be, Room 430b, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Pediatric Pediatric Urology Erasmus MC – University Medical Center Rotterdam, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Building Be, room 430b, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Disorders of sex development (DSD), previously referred to as intersex disorders, comprise a variety of anomalies defined by congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. Besides issues such as gender assignment, clinical and diagnostic evaluation, surgical and psychosocial management, and sex steroid replacement, the significantly increased risk for developing specific types of malignancies is both clinically and biologically relevant. This relates to germ-cell tumors specifically in DSD patients with hypovirilization or gonadal dysgenesis. The presence of a well-defined part of the Y chromosome (known as the GBY region) is a prerequisite for malignant transformation, for which the testis-specific protein on the Y chromosome (TSPY) is a likely candidate gene. The precursor lesions of these cancers are carcinoma in situ (CIS)/intratubular germ-cell neoplasia unclassified (ITGCNU) in testicular tissue and gonadoblastoma in those without obvious testicular differentiation. Most recently, undifferentiated gonadal tissue (UGT) has been identified as the likely precursor for gonadoblastoma. The availability of markers for the different developmental stages of germ cells allows detailed investigation of the characteristics of normal and (pre)malignant germ cells. Although informative in a diagnostic setting for adult male patients, these markers – such as OCT3/4 – cannot easily distinguish (pre)malignant germ cells from germ cells showing delayed maturation. This latter phenomenon is frequently found in gonads of DSD patients, and may be related to the risk of malignant transformation. Thus, the mere application of these markers might result in over-diagnosis and unnecessary gonadectomy. It is proposed that morphological and histological evaluation of gonadal tissue, in combination with OCT3/4 and TSPY double immunohistochemistry and clinical parameters, is most informative in estimating the risk for germ-cell tumor development in the individual patient, and might in future be used to develop a decision tree for optimal management of patients with DSD.

Key words: germ-cell development, malignant transformation, CIS/ITGCNU, gonadoblastoma, cancer risk, delayed maturation, diagnostic markers, prediction model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-690X(07)00038-3

doi:10.1016/j.beem.2007.05.001

Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 480-495, September 2007