Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 69-85, March 2007

Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumours

  • Anders Sundin, MD, PhD (Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 18 611 00 00.

Centre for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

Centre for Medical Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

Department of Oncological Endocrinology, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

The diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and monitoring of therapy in many patients relies mainly on morphological imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, functional imaging modalities – such as somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) – have great impact on patient management by providing tools for better staging of the disease, visualization of occult tumour, and evaluation of eligibility for somatostatin analogue treatment. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) is a powerful functional modality for oncological imaging. Unfortunately, FDG is not accumulated in NETs except in the case of dedifferentiated tumours and tumours with high proliferative activity. Based on the concept of amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD), the 18F- and 11C-labelled amine precursors L-dihydroxyphenylalanine and 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP) have been utilized for PET imaging of NETs. In comparative studies of patients with a variety of NETs, 11C5-HTP-PET proved better than CT and SRS by visualizing additional small lesions. With carbidopa premedication orally before 11C5-HTP-PET examination the tumour uptake could be increased and the urinary radioactivity concentration considerably reduced. This concept may also be applied to 18F-L-DOPA-PET, a method which in a limited number of studies has gained additional diagnostic information in NET patients compared to SRS and morphological imaging. 68Ga is available from an in-house generator and has been utilized for labelling of somatostatin analogues for PET imaging of NETs with promising results in a small number of patients. However, SRS is an established functional imaging method for patients with NETs, whereas the role for PET in the clinical routine needs further evaluation in comparative studies in larger groups of patients.

Key words: NET, neuroendocrine, carcinoid, EPT, SRS, somatostatin, PET, positron, 5-hydroxytryptophan, L-DOPA

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-690X(06)00112-6

doi:10.1016/j.beem.2006.12.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 69-85, March 2007