Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 20, Supplement 1 , Pages S31-S45, December 2006

What is the optimal strategy for postoperative treatment with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting?

  • Fritz Jänicke (Professor; Chairman and Head of the Department of Gynecology)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 40 4 28 03 3510; Fax: +49 40 4 28 03 4355.
  • Paolo Pronzato (Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Tel.: +39 0187 533 688; Fax: +39 0187 533 688.
    • Present Address: Department of Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, largo R.Benzi 10, 10632 Genova. Tel.: +39 010 5600668; Fax +39 010 5600850.

Center of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg D-20246, Germany

Department of Oncology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Via V Veneto, La Spezia, 19100, Italy

After several decades as the gold standard endocrine adjuvant therapy for hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer, tamoxifen is now being displaced by the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AI). In large, randomized, controlled trials the AIs have demonstrated superior efficacy and at-least equivalent tolerability to tamoxifen, findings which are reflected in international guidelines, which now recommend the inclusion of an AI in adjuvant therapy for HR+ disease in postmenopausal women. To date, two treatment strategies have been investigated and were shown to significantly improve outcomes compared with 5 years of tamoxifen. Upfront substitution of tamoxifen with letrozole or anastrozole, and switching patients who are disease-free after 2–3 years of tamoxifen onto anastrozole or exemestane have both been shown to reduce recurrences. The efficacy of sequential therapy, that is, starting tamoxifen with the intention of changing onto an AI after 2–3 years, or vice versa, is unconfirmed, and further investigations are ongoing. Despite the proven benefits, how best to incorporate AIs into adjuvant therapy is currently unclear: data concerning direct comparisons of the different treatment regimens are lacking, and methodological differences between trials make cross-trial comparisons problematic. The arguments for and against upfront AI use and starting an AI after 2–3 years of tamoxifen, based on both efficacy and safety data, are discussed in this article. Clinical differences between the three AIs are also considered, with particular reference to the prevention of distant metastases, which are still incurable. Although randomized, controlled trials comparing the different AIs and treatment strategies are required to elucidate the optimum treatment strategy for adjuvant endocrine therapy, it is important to note that, in oncology, the best outcomes are always achieved when the most effective agent is used first; in the case of HR+ early breast cancer, recent findings indicate that this is clearly an AI.

Key words: Tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, upfront substitution, sequential therapy, breast cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-690X(06)00080-7

doi:10.1016/j.beem.2006.10.001

Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Volume 20, Supplement 1 , Pages S31-S45, December 2006